A theological ethic, part 2
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOSvNwaELgiqrlwYOOeEMR0OIoz8D-mrqBkgajKGI-x_585IS1PxtjMMQtoDW-NJdp7inShYQaAO_Fo70UqEChg87CuMwoVMForVciwBy9TFTC7AdTLn6vPetl0T-yO0_-IrdifWVPrp0/s640/10042.png)
This is the second in a series of posts adapted from the lecture "What is a Theological Ethic?" by Dr. Gary Deddo, professor at GCS . For other posts in this series, click a number: 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 . There is a tendency to approach obedience to God's directives and instructions in one of two misguided ways. The first is legalism -- seeking through obedience to earn God's favor, thus overlooking the reality that God's grace underlies all of God's commands. The second misdirected approach is antinomianism -- treating God's commands as arbitrary and thus subject to being re-worked or entirely dismissed. Both approaches undermine true biblical obedience, which the apostle Paul calls the obedience of faith (or the obedience that comes from faith ) (Rom. 1:5; 16:26). Legalism and antinomianism both arise when the commands of God are detached from their biblical context -- their grounding in the grand narrative of God's plan for humanity with its fou